https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388577 The court upheld the withdrawal of benefits under Ext.P1 notification for interstate sales of tread rubber, emphasizing statutory compliance and rejecting retrospective application challenges. It affirmed the necessity of sales to registered dealers for exemption under Ext.P8 notification, denying benefits claimed under Ext.P1. The court allowed set off of input credit against output tax for interstate sales, directing reassessment to consider tax paid on input purchases for sales to unregistered dealers, providing an opportunity for the petitioner to benefit from any Amnesty Scheme. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388577 The court upheld the withdrawal of benefits under Ext.P1 notification for interstate sales of tread rubber, emphasizing statutory compliance and rejecting retrospective application challenges. It affirmed the necessity of sales to registered dealers for exemption under Ext.P8 notification, denying benefits claimed under Ext.P1. The court allowed set off of input credit against output tax for interstate sales, directing reassessment to consider tax paid on input purchases for sales to unregistered dealers, providing an opportunity for the petitioner to benefit from any Amnesty Scheme. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388577