<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 824 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388575</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision challenging the imposition of a 12.5% tax rate on commodities such as bolders, sand, and pipes. The court held that the deduction rate at source and the commodity tax rate are distinct, and the absence of maintained books of accounts limited the arguments that could be raised. The court emphasized the importance of proper record-keeping for tax compliance and dispute resolution, ultimately finding the revision lacking in merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 824 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388575</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision challenging the imposition of a 12.5% tax rate on commodities such as bolders, sand, and pipes. The court held that the deduction rate at source and the commodity tax rate are distinct, and the absence of maintained books of accounts limited the arguments that could be raised. The court emphasized the importance of proper record-keeping for tax compliance and dispute resolution, ultimately finding the revision lacking in merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>