https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388573 The Uttarakhand High Court found a writ petition premature as the petitioner had not responded to a show cause notice regarding detained goods with an expired E-way bill. Emphasizing the need for due process, the court highlighted the requirement for an opportunity of hearing before imposing penalties or taxes. The judgment focused on procedural aspects, emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to legal requirements. The court disposed of the petition without delving into penalty specifics, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedures in cases involving tax and penalty imposition under the CGST Act, 2017. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:20:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388573 The Uttarakhand High Court found a writ petition premature as the petitioner had not responded to a show cause notice regarding detained goods with an expired E-way bill. Emphasizing the need for due process, the court highlighted the requirement for an opportunity of hearing before imposing penalties or taxes. The judgment focused on procedural aspects, emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to legal requirements. The court disposed of the petition without delving into penalty specifics, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedures in cases involving tax and penalty imposition under the CGST Act, 2017. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388573