<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1942 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284436</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case concerning disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D. The interest portion was excluded from disallowance as the appellant&#039;s own funds exceeded investments. The disallowance was restricted to dividend income from non-trade investments, aligning with legal precedents. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was pronounced on 23.05.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:18:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1942 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284436</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a case concerning disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D. The interest portion was excluded from disallowance as the appellant&#039;s own funds exceeded investments. The disallowance was restricted to dividend income from non-trade investments, aligning with legal precedents. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was pronounced on 23.05.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>