<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 93 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20456</link>
    <description>Under the Explanation to section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the period during which proceedings pursuant to a section 6 declaration are stayed by a court must be excluded from the two-year time limit for making the award. The exclusion is not confined to stays obtained by the landholder; it applies whenever a court order prevents completion of the acquisition proceedings. The provision is intended to stop delay by the acquisition authority, and that object is not defeated because the stay was granted at the instance of another party. On that basis, the acquisition proceedings were treated as not having lapsed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 93 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20456</link>
      <description>Under the Explanation to section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the period during which proceedings pursuant to a section 6 declaration are stayed by a court must be excluded from the two-year time limit for making the award. The exclusion is not confined to stays obtained by the landholder; it applies whenever a court order prevents completion of the acquisition proceedings. The provision is intended to stop delay by the acquisition authority, and that object is not defeated because the stay was granted at the instance of another party. On that basis, the acquisition proceedings were treated as not having lapsed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>