<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 819 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388570</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the additional IGST paid by the petitioner within four weeks, considering the Circular addressing discrepancies in IGST refunds and the importance of supporting exporters and foreign currency augmentation. The Writ Petition was disposed of with this direction, without imposing any costs on the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 819 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388570</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the additional IGST paid by the petitioner within four weeks, considering the Circular addressing discrepancies in IGST refunds and the importance of supporting exporters and foreign currency augmentation. The Writ Petition was disposed of with this direction, without imposing any costs on the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>