<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment for A.Y. 2012-2013 and deleting the addition of Rs. 21,28,020 under section 69A. The decision was based on factual inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and lack of application of mind by the A.O., rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid and legally flawed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment for A.Y. 2012-2013 and deleting the addition of Rs. 21,28,020 under section 69A. The decision was based on factual inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and lack of application of mind by the A.O., rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid and legally flawed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>