<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 797 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant, determining that the compensation received for the termination of the long-term lease was a capital receipt not subject to taxation. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of legal provisions, agreements, and precedents, distinguishing between capital and revenue receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 797 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant, determining that the compensation received for the termination of the long-term lease was a capital receipt not subject to taxation. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of legal provisions, agreements, and precedents, distinguishing between capital and revenue receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>