https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388547 Failure to satisfactorily explain the source of confiscated gold justified continuation of the confiscation order. The appellant did not provide an adequate explanation for possession of the gold, and the Court accepted the High Court's view that there was no basis to interfere. The confiscation was therefore sustained on the facts, with the issue resolved against the appellant and in favour of the respondent. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:01:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388547 Failure to satisfactorily explain the source of confiscated gold justified continuation of the confiscation order. The appellant did not provide an adequate explanation for possession of the gold, and the Court accepted the High Court's view that there was no basis to interfere. The confiscation was therefore sustained on the facts, with the issue resolved against the appellant and in favour of the respondent. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388547