<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 793 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388544</link>
    <description>Cancellation of Bail Order: The High Court resolved the grievance regarding non-furnishing of necessary documents by the petitioner, leading to the disposal of the cancellation application and acceptance of the documents.Review Application for Correction: The Court acknowledged and partially allowed a review application to correct an inadvertent mistake in an interim order related to a service tax evasion case.Challenge Against Arrest and Bail Denial: The High Court granted interim bail to the petitioner, a Managing Director, challenging arrest for service tax evasion and denial of bail, without delving into the validity of amendments to the Service Tax Act.Challenge to Amendments in Service Tax Act: Despite not examining the validity of amendments reclassifying offenses, the Court upheld the interim bail granted to the petitioner due to the extended adjudication process duration, disposing of the petition in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 793 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388544</link>
      <description>Cancellation of Bail Order: The High Court resolved the grievance regarding non-furnishing of necessary documents by the petitioner, leading to the disposal of the cancellation application and acceptance of the documents.Review Application for Correction: The Court acknowledged and partially allowed a review application to correct an inadvertent mistake in an interim order related to a service tax evasion case.Challenge Against Arrest and Bail Denial: The High Court granted interim bail to the petitioner, a Managing Director, challenging arrest for service tax evasion and denial of bail, without delving into the validity of amendments to the Service Tax Act.Challenge to Amendments in Service Tax Act: Despite not examining the validity of amendments reclassifying offenses, the Court upheld the interim bail granted to the petitioner due to the extended adjudication process duration, disposing of the petition in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>