<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty to 25% in accordance with the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s timely payment of the reduced amount influenced the modification of the impugned order, maintaining other aspects of the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty to 25% in accordance with the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s timely payment of the reduced amount influenced the modification of the impugned order, maintaining other aspects of the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>