<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 788 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388539</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to exempt services provided to governmental authorities under specific notifications. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the service tax demand was rejected as the institutions receiving services were deemed &#039;governmental authorities&#039; established by Acts of Parliament and State Legislature. The tribunal emphasized the significance of legal interpretations and referenced precedents from the Patna High Court and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in support of its decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument challenging the Patna High Court decision was dismissed due to the absence of a stay on the order&#039;s operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 788 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388539</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to exempt services provided to governmental authorities under specific notifications. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the service tax demand was rejected as the institutions receiving services were deemed &#039;governmental authorities&#039; established by Acts of Parliament and State Legislature. The tribunal emphasized the significance of legal interpretations and referenced precedents from the Patna High Court and Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in support of its decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument challenging the Patna High Court decision was dismissed due to the absence of a stay on the order&#039;s operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>