<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee by allowing Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) expenses as revenue expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The decision was based on previous rulings and the Co-ordinate Bench&#039;s order for the assessment year 2009-10, emphasizing consistency in treating ESOP expenses as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee by allowing Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) expenses as revenue expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The decision was based on previous rulings and the Co-ordinate Bench&#039;s order for the assessment year 2009-10, emphasizing consistency in treating ESOP expenses as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>