https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284418 The appellate tribunal held that the demand raised under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for goods removed during a dacoity incident was time-barred as the show cause notice was issued beyond the 6-month limit specified by the rule. Consequently, the demand against the appellant was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:23:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284418 The appellate tribunal held that the demand raised under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for goods removed during a dacoity incident was time-barred as the show cause notice was issued beyond the 6-month limit specified by the rule. Consequently, the demand against the appellant was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284418