<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1715 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deductions under section 80IB for hedging profits and expenses for business unit maintenance. Disallowances under section 14A were upheld with a 5% adjustment. The Tribunal directed the AO to decide disallowances to book profit under section 115JB without section 14A computation. The decisions were based on prior rulings and legal interpretations of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1715 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deductions under section 80IB for hedging profits and expenses for business unit maintenance. Disallowances under section 14A were upheld with a 5% adjustment. The Tribunal directed the AO to decide disallowances to book profit under section 115JB without section 14A computation. The decisions were based on prior rulings and legal interpretations of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>