<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1779 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the claim of broken period interest paid by the assessee on deposits and borrowings. The Tribunal relied on previous Tribunal orders, legal principles of accounting, and relevant circulars to support the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the allowance of broken period interest as a deduction for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1779 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the claim of broken period interest paid by the assessee on deposits and borrowings. The Tribunal relied on previous Tribunal orders, legal principles of accounting, and relevant circulars to support the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the allowance of broken period interest as a deduction for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>