<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1732 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284424</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the appeal by the Revenue against the allowance of Cenvat credit on duty paid LPG gas availed by M/s. Jindal Steel and Power Limited. CESTAT relied on precedents from various courts supporting input credit in cases of repairs and maintenance, including cases from High Courts like Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan. The Tribunal emphasized that the pendency of cases awaiting consideration by the Apex Court was not enough to keep the appeal pending unless a contradictory view emerged. Thus, the appeal was dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1732 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284424</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the appeal by the Revenue against the allowance of Cenvat credit on duty paid LPG gas availed by M/s. Jindal Steel and Power Limited. CESTAT relied on precedents from various courts supporting input credit in cases of repairs and maintenance, including cases from High Courts like Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan. The Tribunal emphasized that the pendency of cases awaiting consideration by the Apex Court was not enough to keep the appeal pending unless a contradictory view emerged. Thus, the appeal was dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>