https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528 An administrative order rejecting a claim under the Served from India Scheme could not stand where the authority failed to consider the petitioner's representations and supporting documents and gave no reasons. The High Court held that an order affecting rights must reflect meaningful application of mind and comply with the requirement of a speaking order; otherwise it is procedurally infirm. The impugned rejection was therefore quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after granting an opportunity of hearing and passing a reasoned order. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528 An administrative order rejecting a claim under the Served from India Scheme could not stand where the authority failed to consider the petitioner's representations and supporting documents and gave no reasons. The High Court held that an order affecting rights must reflect meaningful application of mind and comply with the requirement of a speaking order; otherwise it is procedurally infirm. The impugned rejection was therefore quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after granting an opportunity of hearing and passing a reasoned order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528