<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 777 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order denying benefits under the Served from India Scheme (SFIS) to the Indian healthcare company. The court found the order lacked reasoning, failed to consider detailed representations, and denied the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The matter was remanded to the fourth respondent for a reevaluation, directing them to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering all material and objections in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 777 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order denying benefits under the Served from India Scheme (SFIS) to the Indian healthcare company. The court found the order lacked reasoning, failed to consider detailed representations, and denied the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The matter was remanded to the fourth respondent for a reevaluation, directing them to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering all material and objections in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>