<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 772 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388523</link>
    <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can proceed only where an operational debt is shown to be due and payable and there is no genuine pre-existing dispute. Here, the claim was tested against the purchase order terms, the materials supplied and objections that the goods were of inferior quality, but the record did not satisfactorily establish conformity with contractual requirements or the amount claimed. The Tribunal treated the filing as having a debt-recovery character and found that Section 9 cannot be used as a substitute for recovery proceedings. The application was rejected for want of a fit case for admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 772 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388523</link>
      <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can proceed only where an operational debt is shown to be due and payable and there is no genuine pre-existing dispute. Here, the claim was tested against the purchase order terms, the materials supplied and objections that the goods were of inferior quality, but the record did not satisfactorily establish conformity with contractual requirements or the amount claimed. The Tribunal treated the filing as having a debt-recovery character and found that Section 9 cannot be used as a substitute for recovery proceedings. The application was rejected for want of a fit case for admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>