<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 770 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, DIVISION BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition in an Insolvency Bankruptcy Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The dispute between the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor existed before the Section 8 Notice was issued, as evidenced by the Corporate Debtor&#039;s communication regarding equipment breakdowns and project hindrances. The acknowledgment of debt in an earlier letter did not apply to subsequent invoices due to the ongoing dispute. The judgment underscores the importance of analyzing acknowledgments and disputes in insolvency cases to determine the validity of claims and notices, emphasizing clear communication to prevent legal disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:31:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 770 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, DIVISION BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition in an Insolvency Bankruptcy Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The dispute between the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor existed before the Section 8 Notice was issued, as evidenced by the Corporate Debtor&#039;s communication regarding equipment breakdowns and project hindrances. The acknowledgment of debt in an earlier letter did not apply to subsequent invoices due to the ongoing dispute. The judgment underscores the importance of analyzing acknowledgments and disputes in insolvency cases to determine the validity of claims and notices, emphasizing clear communication to prevent legal disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>