<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 765 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388516</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the communication directing provisional attachment of a bank account under the CGST Act, 2017, as the appellant had paid the entire amount due. The court emphasized the importance of timely payment to avoid such actions, rendering the attachment order invalid. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of fulfilling tax obligations promptly to prevent legal consequences like asset attachment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:28:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 765 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388516</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the communication directing provisional attachment of a bank account under the CGST Act, 2017, as the appellant had paid the entire amount due. The court emphasized the importance of timely payment to avoid such actions, rendering the attachment order invalid. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of fulfilling tax obligations promptly to prevent legal consequences like asset attachment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>