<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 737 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388488</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to provide a copy of the order to the petitioner, clarifying the obligation to serve orders for appeals. The court left the limitation issue open, emphasizing the importance of timely receipt of legal documents for effective exercise of rights. This decision ensures fairness and procedural compliance, highlighting the significance of serving orders promptly to enable parties to pursue legal remedies efficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 737 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388488</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to provide a copy of the order to the petitioner, clarifying the obligation to serve orders for appeals. The court left the limitation issue open, emphasizing the importance of timely receipt of legal documents for effective exercise of rights. This decision ensures fairness and procedural compliance, highlighting the significance of serving orders promptly to enable parties to pursue legal remedies efficiently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>