<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 734 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the import consignment of Dietary Supplements violated the Food Safety &amp;amp; Standards Act. The CHA firm was held liable for penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act for failing to ensure compliance with legal requirements. The case was remanded to reconsider imposing penalties on the CHA firm under Section 112A of the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance in importation processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 734 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the import consignment of Dietary Supplements violated the Food Safety &amp;amp; Standards Act. The CHA firm was held liable for penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act for failing to ensure compliance with legal requirements. The case was remanded to reconsider imposing penalties on the CHA firm under Section 112A of the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance in importation processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>