<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20434</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the foreign technician, holding that the approval for exemption from income tax should relate back to the date of the application, despite the delay caused by the Central Government. The Court emphasized that the technician should not be penalized for the administrative delay as the employer had fulfilled all requirements within the prescribed timeline. Therefore, the technician was deemed eligible for the benefit of exemption under section 10(6)(viia)(1)(B) for the assessment year 1975-76.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20434</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the foreign technician, holding that the approval for exemption from income tax should relate back to the date of the application, despite the delay caused by the Central Government. The Court emphasized that the technician should not be penalized for the administrative delay as the employer had fulfilled all requirements within the prescribed timeline. Therefore, the technician was deemed eligible for the benefit of exemption under section 10(6)(viia)(1)(B) for the assessment year 1975-76.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>