https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284404 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision that directed the sanction of pension benefits to a respondent claiming freedom fighter status. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting necessary requirements for entitlement and clarified that the High Court cannot act as an appellate authority over the State Government's decision unless findings are unreasonable. The High Court's liberal approach in relaxing pension entitlement criteria was deemed inappropriate, leading to the reinstatement of the State Government's decision. The respondent was given the opportunity to represent the case to the State Government for reconsideration or relaxation of scheme requirements. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2019 11:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284404 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision that directed the sanction of pension benefits to a respondent claiming freedom fighter status. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting necessary requirements for entitlement and clarified that the High Court cannot act as an appellate authority over the State Government's decision unless findings are unreasonable. The High Court's liberal approach in relaxing pension entitlement criteria was deemed inappropriate, leading to the reinstatement of the State Government's decision. The respondent was given the opportunity to represent the case to the State Government for reconsideration or relaxation of scheme requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284404