<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 697 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the respondent company before the CIT(A) was not maintainable under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under Section 195(2). The appeal was allowed in favor of the Revenue, and other substantive tax issues, including taxability of income in India, DTAA benefits, and PE status, were not addressed due to the decision on maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 697 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the respondent company before the CIT(A) was not maintainable under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under Section 195(2). The appeal was allowed in favor of the Revenue, and other substantive tax issues, including taxability of income in India, DTAA benefits, and PE status, were not addressed due to the decision on maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>