<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 695 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, deleting a portion of the addition related to identified loans while confirming the remainder. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating the sources of cash deposits to avoid unexplained income assessments and highlighted the significance of providing concrete evidence to support claims and the impact of penalties under the Income Tax Act on related additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 695 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, deleting a portion of the addition related to identified loans while confirming the remainder. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating the sources of cash deposits to avoid unexplained income assessments and highlighted the significance of providing concrete evidence to support claims and the impact of penalties under the Income Tax Act on related additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>