<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 677 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant on both issues. It upheld the requirement for reversing the proportionate common input service tax credit related to trading activities, aligning with the precedent set by the Delhi HC in M/s. Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Furthermore, it supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation for the Show Cause Notice, as the appellant&#039;s actions indicated awareness of the legal requirements. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the reversal of service tax credit and the challenge to the extended limitation period, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 677 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant on both issues. It upheld the requirement for reversing the proportionate common input service tax credit related to trading activities, aligning with the precedent set by the Delhi HC in M/s. Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Furthermore, it supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation for the Show Cause Notice, as the appellant&#039;s actions indicated awareness of the legal requirements. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the reversal of service tax credit and the challenge to the extended limitation period, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>