<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388424</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the appellate order, and directed the proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice to continue. The Respondent was granted three weeks to respond to the notice. The Court emphasized that the Internal Order was not a final determination under Section 11A and was not appealable. The case was to proceed in accordance with the law, focusing on the jurisdiction issue and the manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388424</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the appellate order, and directed the proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice to continue. The Respondent was granted three weeks to respond to the notice. The Court emphasized that the Internal Order was not a final determination under Section 11A and was not appealable. The case was to proceed in accordance with the law, focusing on the jurisdiction issue and the manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>