<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 671 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388422</link>
    <description>Once eligibility for exemption is established, the benefit should relate back to the date of application rather than a later date fixed after departmental verification. Procedural delay in issuing the certificate cannot postpone substantive exemption where the applicant had complied and the required formalities were completed. The refund claim is also maintainable where the duty burden was reimbursed under the purchase arrangement and was reflected as loans and advances, rather than being passed on to third parties. On that basis, procedural lapses and unjust enrichment did not defeat the refund claim, and the rejection of refund was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 671 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388422</link>
      <description>Once eligibility for exemption is established, the benefit should relate back to the date of application rather than a later date fixed after departmental verification. Procedural delay in issuing the certificate cannot postpone substantive exemption where the applicant had complied and the required formalities were completed. The refund claim is also maintainable where the duty burden was reimbursed under the purchase arrangement and was reflected as loans and advances, rather than being passed on to third parties. On that basis, procedural lapses and unjust enrichment did not defeat the refund claim, and the rejection of refund was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>