<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1713 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284383</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained where the Assessing Officer issued detailed notices, called for records and conducted multiple hearings before completing assessment. The assessment materials showed enquiry into TDS on transport, labour and machinery hire charges, EPF contribution, work-in-progress, cash deposits and supporting vouchers, so the order could not be treated as one passed without application of mind. A Commissioner may not invoke revision merely because the enquiry is considered inadequate or a different view of the same material is preferred. The revisional order was therefore unsustainable and the assessment remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1713 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284383</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained where the Assessing Officer issued detailed notices, called for records and conducted multiple hearings before completing assessment. The assessment materials showed enquiry into TDS on transport, labour and machinery hire charges, EPF contribution, work-in-progress, cash deposits and supporting vouchers, so the order could not be treated as one passed without application of mind. A Commissioner may not invoke revision merely because the enquiry is considered inadequate or a different view of the same material is preferred. The revisional order was therefore unsustainable and the assessment remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>