<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20417</link>
    <description>Sections 10(10) and 10(10AA) validly distinguish Government employees from other employees for gratuity and leave-encashment exemptions. Fiscal legislation has wider latitude for classification, and the distinction satisfies article 14 because it rests on an intelligible basis connected with the statutory object. The constitutional challenge therefore fails. &quot;Salary&quot; for these exemptions is confined to rule 2(h) of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, expressly incorporated by section 10(10). It includes dearness allowance only where employment terms provide, while excluding other allowances and perquisites; a broader interpretation cannot be adopted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20417</link>
      <description>Sections 10(10) and 10(10AA) validly distinguish Government employees from other employees for gratuity and leave-encashment exemptions. Fiscal legislation has wider latitude for classification, and the distinction satisfies article 14 because it rests on an intelligible basis connected with the statutory object. The constitutional challenge therefore fails. &quot;Salary&quot; for these exemptions is confined to rule 2(h) of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, expressly incorporated by section 10(10). It includes dearness allowance only where employment terms provide, while excluding other allowances and perquisites; a broader interpretation cannot be adopted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>