<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 658 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388409</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in two writ petitions challenging orders rejecting refund claims. The court held that the orders violated principles of natural justice as no opportunity for a personal hearing was granted. The court directed the parties to treat the orders as show cause notices, allowing the petitioner to respond. The second respondent was instructed to reconsider the claims after considering the objections and providing a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 658 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388409</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in two writ petitions challenging orders rejecting refund claims. The court held that the orders violated principles of natural justice as no opportunity for a personal hearing was granted. The court directed the parties to treat the orders as show cause notices, allowing the petitioner to respond. The second respondent was instructed to reconsider the claims after considering the objections and providing a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>