<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 647 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It upheld the addition under Section 43B for excise duty payments, as the assessee had made the necessary payments. The addition under Section 40A(3) for cash payments was also dismissed, considering the genuine business exigencies and transactions. However, the disallowance of depreciation on the motor lorry was upheld due to the lack of supporting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 647 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It upheld the addition under Section 43B for excise duty payments, as the assessee had made the necessary payments. The addition under Section 40A(3) for cash payments was also dismissed, considering the genuine business exigencies and transactions. However, the disallowance of depreciation on the motor lorry was upheld due to the lack of supporting evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>