<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 644 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388395</link>
    <description>Running public bus services may fall within the object of general public utility where the service is available to the public at large and not confined to a select class. The proviso to section 2(15) depends on whether the activity amounts to trade, commerce or business with a dominant profit motive; mere fare collection or receipt thresholds are not by themselves decisive. Because the lower authorities had not clearly examined the corporation&#039;s dominant and primary object or the true character of its transport activity, the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration on whether the activity remained a public utility function with only incidental revenue generation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 644 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388395</link>
      <description>Running public bus services may fall within the object of general public utility where the service is available to the public at large and not confined to a select class. The proviso to section 2(15) depends on whether the activity amounts to trade, commerce or business with a dominant profit motive; mere fare collection or receipt thresholds are not by themselves decisive. Because the lower authorities had not clearly examined the corporation&#039;s dominant and primary object or the true character of its transport activity, the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration on whether the activity remained a public utility function with only incidental revenue generation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>