<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380</link>
    <description>Article 14 permits classification between areas brought under consolidation and areas outside it where the distinction is intelligible and reasonably connected to speedy, economical consolidation of agricultural holdings. Different procedures, forums, temporary abatement of proceedings, and reasonable land-use or transfer restrictions may support that legislative objective. An unregistered compromise cannot operate as a title deed where registration is required, but may evidence an admission or recognition of an existing interest without itself creating or extinguishing rights in immovable property. Findings of title based on oral and documentary evidence remain factual findings and are not ordinarily reopened merely because an alternative view is possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380</link>
      <description>Article 14 permits classification between areas brought under consolidation and areas outside it where the distinction is intelligible and reasonably connected to speedy, economical consolidation of agricultural holdings. Different procedures, forums, temporary abatement of proceedings, and reasonable land-use or transfer restrictions may support that legislative objective. An unregistered compromise cannot operate as a title deed where registration is required, but may evidence an admission or recognition of an existing interest without itself creating or extinguishing rights in immovable property. Findings of title based on oral and documentary evidence remain factual findings and are not ordinarily reopened merely because an alternative view is possible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>