https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380 A statutory classification between areas under consolidation and areas outside consolidation under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act was held to have an intelligible differentia and a direct nexus with the object of speedy, economical consolidation, so the Article 14 challenge failed and the provisions were upheld. An unregistered compromise could not operate as a deed of title, but its recital acknowledging the respondent's existing share was admissible as evidence of admission or recognition of antecedent title. The finding on title was treated as a pure finding of fact based on evidence, and it was not open to appellate interference merely because another view was possible. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380 A statutory classification between areas under consolidation and areas outside consolidation under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act was held to have an intelligible differentia and a direct nexus with the object of speedy, economical consolidation, so the Article 14 challenge failed and the provisions were upheld. An unregistered compromise could not operate as a deed of title, but its recital acknowledging the respondent's existing share was admissible as evidence of admission or recognition of antecedent title. The finding on title was treated as a pure finding of fact based on evidence, and it was not open to appellate interference merely because another view was possible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284380