<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 635 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion of ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd., IDC (India) Ltd., and Informed Technologies Ltd. as comparables and ordered the recalculation of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP). The ground related to the exclusion of Ladderup was treated as not pressed. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the S.A. filed by the assessee became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 635 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the inclusion of ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd., IDC (India) Ltd., and Informed Technologies Ltd. as comparables and ordered the recalculation of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP). The ground related to the exclusion of Ladderup was treated as not pressed. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the S.A. filed by the assessee became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>