<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the ld. CIT (A) to delete the addition of income from surrender of tenancy rights as income from other sources instead of LTCG, allowing the deduction under section 54F. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating material during the search and seizure operation, concluding that no addition could be made under section 153A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the ld. CIT (A) to delete the addition of income from surrender of tenancy rights as income from other sources instead of LTCG, allowing the deduction under section 54F. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating material during the search and seizure operation, concluding that no addition could be made under section 153A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>