https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388378 The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's addition of Rs. 29,26,148/- for unexplained investments in jewellery, dismissing the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found the explanations and evidence provided by the assessee regarding the jewellery sources insufficient and lacking credibility. The CIT(A)'s decision was upheld, emphasizing the failure to provide credible documentary evidence for the jewellery in question. The appeal was dismissed entirely, with the Tribunal emphasizing the lack of substantiation for the acquisition sources of the jewellery. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:32:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388378 The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's addition of Rs. 29,26,148/- for unexplained investments in jewellery, dismissing the assessee's appeal. The Tribunal found the explanations and evidence provided by the assessee regarding the jewellery sources insufficient and lacking credibility. The CIT(A)'s decision was upheld, emphasizing the failure to provide credible documentary evidence for the jewellery in question. The appeal was dismissed entirely, with the Tribunal emphasizing the lack of substantiation for the acquisition sources of the jewellery. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388378