https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388372 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and disposed of the stay petition. The appellant was exonerated from the allegations under Regulations 10(e) and 10(n), with no substantial evidence supporting the allegations under Regulations 10(a) and 10(d). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proportionality in punishment and referenced judicial precedents highlighting the need for penalties to be commensurate with violations. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388372 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and disposed of the stay petition. The appellant was exonerated from the allegations under Regulations 10(e) and 10(n), with no substantial evidence supporting the allegations under Regulations 10(a) and 10(d). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proportionality in punishment and referenced judicial precedents highlighting the need for penalties to be commensurate with violations. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388372