<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rejects Revenue&#039;s 67-Day Appeal Delay; Insufficient Justification for Extension Underlines Strict Compliance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50209</link>
    <description>Condonation of 67 days delay in filing the appeal before the CESTAT by the Revenue - The occasion to adopt a liberal approach in matters of condonation of delay would only arise if some cause is made out for the delay - Therefore, the view taken by the Tribunal in the present facts cannot be said to be perverse</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:53:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rejects Revenue&#039;s 67-Day Appeal Delay; Insufficient Justification for Extension Underlines Strict Compliance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50209</link>
      <description>Condonation of 67 days delay in filing the appeal before the CESTAT by the Revenue - The occasion to adopt a liberal approach in matters of condonation of delay would only arise if some cause is made out for the delay - Therefore, the view taken by the Tribunal in the present facts cannot be said to be perverse</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:53:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>