<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 612 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388363</link>
    <description>The Court partly allowed the appeal, confirmed the remand order, and granted the appellant the opportunity to raise the limitation point before the original authority for proper adjudication. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing all relevant issues, including limitation and quantification, during the adjudication process to ensure a just and lawful outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 612 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388363</link>
      <description>The Court partly allowed the appeal, confirmed the remand order, and granted the appellant the opportunity to raise the limitation point before the original authority for proper adjudication. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing all relevant issues, including limitation and quantification, during the adjudication process to ensure a just and lawful outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>