https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388361 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the lack of documentary evidence, the barred limitation period, and the incorrect application of Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and timelines in tax matters, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Department's claims for recovery. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388361 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the lack of documentary evidence, the barred limitation period, and the incorrect application of Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and timelines in tax matters, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Department's claims for recovery. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388361