<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 602 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388353</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the joint and several liability of a director, along with the company, for outstanding tax dues under Section 179(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the orders of the Income Tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax, finding evidence of the director&#039;s involvement in the company&#039;s affairs and lack of steps taken for recovery of dues, despite the defense of not being a director at the relevant time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 602 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388353</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the joint and several liability of a director, along with the company, for outstanding tax dues under Section 179(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the orders of the Income Tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax, finding evidence of the director&#039;s involvement in the company&#039;s affairs and lack of steps taken for recovery of dues, despite the defense of not being a director at the relevant time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>