<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1730 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the notices issued under Section 148 and the consequential assessment orders for AYs 1996-97 and 1997-98. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as infructuous, given the quashing of the assessments. The decision underscores the principle that amendments to tax laws cannot retrospectively revive time-barred assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1730 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the notices issued under Section 148 and the consequential assessment orders for AYs 1996-97 and 1997-98. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as infructuous, given the quashing of the assessments. The decision underscores the principle that amendments to tax laws cannot retrospectively revive time-barred assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>