https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284361 The court allowed the modification of the protective order, emphasizing the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). It directed that the petitioner should not be arrested without following proper procedures but must cooperate with the investigation. The court permitted the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation by DRI officers at a visible distance. Additionally, it ordered videograph recording of the statement and examination of the petitioner and goods, with costs borne by the petitioner. These directives aimed to ensure transparency and fairness in the investigative process. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:33:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284361 The court allowed the modification of the protective order, emphasizing the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). It directed that the petitioner should not be arrested without following proper procedures but must cooperate with the investigation. The court permitted the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation by DRI officers at a visible distance. Additionally, it ordered videograph recording of the statement and examination of the petitioner and goods, with costs borne by the petitioner. These directives aimed to ensure transparency and fairness in the investigative process. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284361