https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284368 The High Court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners in a specific file pending before the Apex Court. The court allowed the advocate to accompany the petitioners during interrogation at a visible but not audible distance. It directed the Department to videograph the recording of statements and examination of petitioners and goods, with costs to be borne by the petitioners. The accused would not be entitled to a copy unless ordered by the Court. The Writ Petition was adjourned for further proceedings. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:33:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284368 The High Court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners in a specific file pending before the Apex Court. The court allowed the advocate to accompany the petitioners during interrogation at a visible but not audible distance. It directed the Department to videograph the recording of statements and examination of petitioners and goods, with costs to be borne by the petitioners. The accused would not be entitled to a copy unless ordered by the Court. The Writ Petition was adjourned for further proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284368