<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1910 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284365</link>
    <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs in raising cost recovery charges, justified the demand pursuant to the 6th Pay Commission, supported the imposition of penalties, and validated the suspension or revocation of the appellant&#039;s approval as custodian. The court also rejected the argument of violation of principles of natural justice, ultimately dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=594032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1910 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284365</link>
      <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs in raising cost recovery charges, justified the demand pursuant to the 6th Pay Commission, supported the imposition of penalties, and validated the suspension or revocation of the appellant&#039;s approval as custodian. The court also rejected the argument of violation of principles of natural justice, ultimately dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>