https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284347 The Privy Council dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence. It emphasized the admissibility of evidence from a previous acquittal for corroboration, the prosecution's discretion in calling witnesses, and the requirement of substantial injustice for interference in criminal proceedings. The High Court's evaluation of evidence was deemed appropriate, and no grave injustice or legal process disregard was found to challenge the conviction. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:18:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284347 The Privy Council dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence. It emphasized the admissibility of evidence from a previous acquittal for corroboration, the prosecution's discretion in calling witnesses, and the requirement of substantial injustice for interference in criminal proceedings. The High Court's evaluation of evidence was deemed appropriate, and no grave injustice or legal process disregard was found to challenge the conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284347