<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 592 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388343</link>
    <description>The court upheld the detention notice under Section 129 of the GST Act due to an expired e-way bill but directed release of the consignment and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for specified amounts. The respondents were instructed to proceed with adjudication under Section 130 of the GST Act following due process, with the petitioner providing necessary documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 592 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388343</link>
      <description>The court upheld the detention notice under Section 129 of the GST Act due to an expired e-way bill but directed release of the consignment and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for specified amounts. The respondents were instructed to proceed with adjudication under Section 130 of the GST Act following due process, with the petitioner providing necessary documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>